Bøger af Bilyana Lilly

Russian Information Warfare: Assault on Democracies in the Cyber Wild Westexamines how Moscow tries to trample the very principles on which democracies are founded and what we can do to stop it. In particular, the book analyzes how the Russian government uses cyber operations, disinformation, protests, assassinations, coup detats, and perhaps even explosions to destroy democracies from within, and what the United States and other NATO countries can do to defend themselves from Russias onslaught. The Kremlin has been using cyber operations as a tool of foreign policy against the political infrastructure of NATO member states for over a decade. Alongside these cyber operations, the Russian government has launched a diverse and devious set of activities which at first glance may appear chaotic. Russian military scholars and doctrine elegantly categorizes these activities as components of a single strategic playbook information warfare. This concept breaks down the binary boundaries of war and peace and views war as a continuous sliding scale of conflict, vacillating between the two extremes of peace and war but never quite reaching either. The Russian government has applied information warfare activities across NATO members to achieve various objectives. What are these objectives? What are the factors that most likely influence Russias decision to launch certain types of cyber operations against political infrastructure and how are they integrated with the Kremlins other information warfare activities? To what extent are these cyber operations and information warfare campaigns effective in achieving Moscows purported goals? Dr. Bilyana Lilly addresses these questions and uses her findings to recommend improvements in the design of U.S. policy to counter Russian adversarial behavior in cyberspace by understanding under what conditions, against what election components, and for what purposes within broader information warfare campaigns Russia uses specific types of cyber operations against political infrastructure.

The model introduced in this report is intended to enhance the predictive capabilities available to cyber defenders while also augmenting resilience by improving preventions and detections of cyber threats. The authors test this model?s effectiveness in attacks on the RAND Corporation and report the results.

This book is devoted to one of the central issues in U.S.-Russian and NATO-Russian relationsballistic missile defense. Drawing on more than 2,000 primary sources, interviews with Russian and NATO officials, and a variety of Russian and Western publications, this book offers an unparalleled, in-depth analysis of the reasons behind Russia's policy towards the construction of a U.S ballistic missile defense in Europe. It provides a critical assessment of the decision-making mechanisms that shape Russia's position on ballistic missile defense, as well as Russia's strategic relations with the United States and Russia's interaction with European and non-European powers. Lilly argues that contrary to Moscow's official claims during the Putin era, Russian objections to the construction of ballistic missile defense in Europe have not been wholly dictated by security concerns. To Russia, missile defense is not purely an issue in and of itself, but rather a symbol and instrument of broader political considerations. At the international level, the factors that have shaped Russia's response include Moscow's perception of the overall state of U.S.-Russian relations, the Kremlin's capacity to project influence and power abroad, and NATO's behavior in the post-Soviet space. Domestically, the issue of missile defense has been a facilitating instrument for strengthening Putin's regime and justifying military modernization. Taken together, these instrumental considerations and their fluctuating intensity in different periods prompt the Russian leadership to pursue contradictory policy approaches simultaneously. On the one hand, the Kremlin seeks U.S. cooperation, while on the other hand, it threatens retaliation and reinforces Russian offensive capabilities. The result is Moscow's incoherence, inconsistency, and double-speak over the issue of missile defense.