Bøger udgivet af Aspen Publishing

CCHC: FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION - 6E

Defining and Acquiring Interests in Property is part of the Aspen Select Series.

National Security Law and Counterterrorism Law, 2023-2024 Supplement

A long-time leader in Evidence courses for its authority, timeliness, and flexibility, Mueller, Kirkpatrick, and Richter's Federal Rules of Evidence, 2023 Edition continues to provide the latest developments in evidence law.New to the 2023 Edition: The Federal Rules as amended through December 2022Pending Amendments to Rules 106, 615, and 702 which take effect December 1, 2023Proposed Amendments to FRE 611(d), 613, 801(d)(2), 804(b)(3), and 1006, which have been published for public comment

"This may be the course in law school in which there is the most variation in subject matter and emphasis. Torts is torts, evidence is evidence, but students are often unsure of the scope of a course in professional responsibility. This identity crisis is revealed in the variety of course titles used by schools: professional responsibility, the legal profession, lawyers and clients, legal ethics. There seem to be at least two distinct subjects wrapped up together under the label of professional responsibility, one having to do with law, the other having to do with standards of right and wrong that are independent of the law. The American Bar Association (ABA) insists that all accredited law schools require a course in the "history, goals, structure, duties, values, and responsibilities of the legal profession and its members." ABA Standards for Approval of Law Schools, Standard 302(b). This language is pretty broad, and a wide variety of courses can be offered that satisfy the ABA's requirement, as long as the course includes some instruction about the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Owing to the flexibility of the ABA's standard, and the fact that law professors have many different approaches to the study of the legal profession, you could conceivably study the rules of professional conduct or the law of malpractice and litigation sanctions, or you could take an interdisciplinary approach borrowing from literature, films, moral philosophy, sociology, or theology, in a course called professional responsibility"--

Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity, by April G. Dawson, is Aspen's concise primer intended to increase student awareness of the protocols, possibilities, and ethical implications of using AI systems in their legal education studies, while also giving professors assurance that their students are informed of the same. AI is having a sudden and profound impact on the legal profession, as it has in virtually professions worldwide. Understanding how to leverage AI tools effectively and appropriately will give law school graduates a competitive edge among legal employers interested to hire tech-savvy young lawyers. But AI is also having a profound impact on the legal education experience. As more and more students seek assistance from ChatGPT and similar tools for their academic work, questions arise as to what they are gaining or sacrificing in the process; and whether, or at what point, using AI in academic work falls within the bounds of academic integrity. Such dramatic developments call for better knowledge and understanding of the ethical implications associated with using AI systems in law school. April G. Dawson explores the pros and cons of using powerful AI tools in law school while maintaining institutional standards for academic rigor and intellectual honesty in legal education--alongside students' own values and developing sense of legal ethics. Professors and students will benefit from: Assurance that AIAI raises student awareness of the importance of 1) using generative AI tools like ChatGPT responsibly; and 2) understanding how academic integrity facilitates learning and prepares students to become ethically responsible in the practice of law; 3) researching and reading their school's code of conduct, and 4) understanding the policies of individual professors with respect to the use of generative AI tools. Reflection: Professional Identity Formation (PIF), questions that prompt students to reflect on their own experiences with generative AI--both its useful applications for learning and practice, as well as the potential for using AI in ways that violate academic integrity and undermine principles of professional responsibility. Examples of individuals making choices and realizing the consequences of their decisions for a range of situations and ethical quandaries Case Studies feature summaries of recent landmark cases and discussion of law and policy. A concise overview of law-specific AI products, the tasks they perform, and the reasons for the legal profession's measured approach to adopting them Incisive discussion of the potential for generative AI's to significantly mitigate, though not fully address, the nation's access to justice crisis

When it's exam time you need the right information in the right format to study efficiently and effectively. Emanuel(R)CrunchTime is the perfect tool for exam studying. With flowcharts and capsule summaries of major points of law and critical issues, as well as exam tips for identifying common traps and pitfalls, sample exam and essay questions with model answers - you will be prepared for your next big test. Here's why you will need Emanuel(R)CrunchTime to help you ace your exams: Perfect for the visual learner: The flow charts walk you through a series of yes/no questions that can be used to analyze any question on the exam. Featured capsule summaries help you quickly review key concepts not just before the exam, but throughout the semester Exams Tips recap the most commonly tested issues and fact patterns.

Experiential Legal Writing: Analysis, Process, and Documents discusses the documents first-year law students are introduced to, including memos, briefs, and client letters, as well as documents that are used in upper-class courses, such as scholarly writing and pleadings. Based on the online legal writing materials available at TeachingLaw, this straightforward text is designed to be used either as an aid to instructors and students working in the electronic environment of TeachingLaw or on its own as a primary or supplementary textbook. Covering the entirety of the writing process, from analysis to citation form, this text Offers a clear instructional approach to legal analysis, legal documents, and the writing process, as well as to legal grammar and usage and to citation style for both ALWD and the Bluebook. Breaks down the analytical and writing processes into manageable tasks and provides students with strategies, examples, and exercises. Introduces each type of legal document with "Purpose, Audience, Scope, and View" bullet points, providing an at-a-glance overview. Employs maps, diagrams, text boxes, and tables to summarize material and provide visual interest. Includes multiple documents annotated with in-depth commentary to help students identify key parts, understand the arguments being made, and understand the strengths of each document. Provides abundant, thorough study aid materials Quick References and Checklists that reinforce and test students' understanding of the material Quizzes and Self-Assessments that allow students and teachers to test students' understanding of the material

Tempers flare and ideals clash following the presidential inauguration of far-right businessman Daniel Stack. As his celebratory supporters gather on a university campus that night, black-clad anarchists suddenly appear and clash with the "Take Back America" crowd. During one melee, Emily Hodgman shoots anarchist Jeremy Dane in the stomach. Emily claims she was defending her husband from a knife-wielding Jeremy. But Emily's Facebook messages suggest it was an act of political violence fueled by her online radicalization. And now attorneys must convince jurors to rise above partisanship and untangle the chaotic events, even as Jeremy refuses to testify and his knife has gone missing. This timely case file offers a balanced viewpoint of both political extremes during an unprecedented era in American politics. The exhibits include pictures from an actual clash between protest participants, providing a taste of the challenges posed by real-world exhibits--photos are not always clear, and the moments they capture can be open to interpretation. Unique expert opinions about online extremism, video game culture, and the body's fight-or-flight response round out the testimony. Quick and entertaining, State v. Hodgmanwill provide a realistic training environment while keeping participants interested and engaged. Instructors and participants will benefit from: Downloadable, color versions of realistic exhibits, including diagrams, social media postings, and cell-phone photos taken during an actual altercation at a political rally The author's real-life experience as a journalist and criminal prosecutor Four witnesses for both the prosecution and the defense, including optional expert witnesses Opportunities to explore thorny questions about the role of politics, media, and video game culture in modern courtrooms

Stein and Rubinowitz discuss the concept that many of us learn intellectually, others of us learn existentially, and then there are the rest of us that learn by doing. In Compendium of Trial Advocacy Drills, the student will practice the skills taught verbally in the classroom through a hands-on approach.

Stucky v. Conlee, Parsell, and Nita City, a civil rights action, provides timely insight into today's racially charged atmosphere between law enforcement and persons of color. Plaintiff Clayton Stucky is a Black state trooper who was pulled over by two white Nita City police officers. Plaintiff Stucky contends that he was pulled over for "driving while Black." Officers Conlee and Parsell of the Nita City Police Department allege that Stucky was driving at an unsafe speed, since he was allegedly driving more than fifty miles per hour in a twenty-five mile per hour zone. Stucky refused Conlee's and Parsell's requests to search his vehicle.A district judge found Stucky not guilty of the traffic offense. Stucky then sued Conlee and Parsell for damages caused by their violation of Stucky's right to be free from an unreasonable seizure and his right to equal protection of the laws. Stucky also named Nita City as a defendant, alleging that Nita City Police Chief Kurt Lieber's training and supervision of Conlee and Parsell was deliberately indifferent with respect to the risk of racial profiling, and that Lieber's deliberate indifference was a cause of Conlee's and Parsell's stopping Stucky without probable cause and based upon Stucky's race.There are three witnesses for each side, as well as a racial profiling expert and medical expert for each side. New for the Third Edition, deposition files have been developed for plaintiffs, defendants, and faculty, while the trial file has also been updated. Updates for this Third Edition include updates to the witness statements, new information in the plaintiff's racial profiling expert's file, updated exhibits, and a legal memo.The deposition version reflects the reality of deposition practice, when each party only has certain documents. The plaintiff file contains materials only available to the plaintiff side to aid in prepping for depositions. The defendant file contains materials only available to defendant side. The faculty file contains both the plaintiff and defendant material and is for instructor use.

It's David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI's failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. One of NITA's most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. New to the Revised 11th Edition: Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion Professors and students will benefit from: A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits

The Supplement will include the Supreme Court cases from October Term 2021. New to the 2022 Edition: Thoroughly updated to provide analysis of important, recent decisions in the area of Criminal Procedure, including several decisions from the Supreme Court's most recent terms and discussion of policy issues at the forefront of criminal law. Changes in Investigations chapters: New case: Vega v. Tekoh (the ability to sue police for violating Miranda v. Arizona) New material on police excessive force and on remedies against the police for constitutional violations. Changes in Adjudication chapters: New cases, including United States v. Tsarnaev (jury selection in high-profile cases); Bucklew v. Precythe (execution methods in death penalty cases); and Denezpi v. United States (dual sovereignty exception to the double jeopardy rule) Amended Rules 16(a)(1)(G) and 16(b)(1)(C) (Expert Witnesses)

Long before the courtroom, deposition table, or settlement meeting, legal cases are won or lost on the strength of the information lawyers glean from clients and witnesses. Unfortunately, gleaning that information is a skill too often overlooked in the rush to form legal theories and determine goals. In this new experiential learning workbook, Professor Cristina Tilley provides practical advice for improving those skills. Marrying the interviewing techniques she developed as a journalist with her litigation experience and doctrinal skills, Professor Tilley has developed Loyola School of Law's Interviewing Skills curriculum, spending several years honing her techniques. Legal Interviewing draws on the insights Prof. Tilley has gained over years of interviewing subjects from all walks of life and shapes the resulting information in a clear and persuasive narrative form. The students then take the lessons taught into lively, interactive exercises that allow the students to practice the multiple steps of successfully interviewing clients, witnesses (both friendly and hostile), and administrators. The unique design of this program provides participants with hands-on experience by presenting materials for two hypothetical legal matters: Dashwood, a civil case involving an elderly woman's independence; and Moore, a criminal case involving a young African-American woman accused of shoplifting. To create the interactive experience, participants receive one of two versions: Materials for A's or Materials for B's. Both versions include Part One: Interviewing Theory. Part Two of the A's version contains the attorney materials for Dashwood and the interviewee materials for Moore; the B's version contains the attorney materials for Moore and the interviewee materials for Dashwood. The participants experience hands-on learning as Group A interviews Group B, and Group B in turn interviews Group A. These interview exercises coordinate with the book chapters, guiding participants through each the stage of the interviewing process.

It's David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI's failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. One of NITA's most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. New to the Revised 11th Edition: Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion Professors and students will benefit from: A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits

Presenting the U. S. juvenile justice system in a logical, chronological format, Juvenile Justice provides the most recent and detailed information about a broad range of topics. The balanced presentation gives key insights from political science, public administration, sociology, criminology, and criminal justice as well as the important historical backdrop. Carefully dealing with all the major processing points and agencies, Juvenile Justice covers all the pressing issues that are confronted within the contemporary system. This text is available in ebook format from the VitalSource Store. To download and use the ebook, you will need the free VitalSource Bookshelf software. DOWNLOAD NOW An engaging and realistic vignette opens each chapter to stimulate thinking and classroom discussion, and its implications are woven throughout the chapter. The exceedingly readable narrative explains basic terms and concepts along with valuable historical background. Three themes, woven throughout the materials, given students a solid understanding: the role of theory as a tool to describe, understand, predict and control delinquency; how appreciating the historical background can give insight into future practices; and the importance of globalization in a world increasingly interconnected by the Internet and social media― international perspectives are included in every chapter. Critical thinking questions at the end of each chapter can be used for classroom discussions, small group exercises, or individual review. Key terms, defined in the margins, and a comprehensive glossary help students learn and review terminology. Juvenile Justice is accompanied by an extensive Instructor's Manual, which provides the teacher with ancillary material as well as a perspective on the organization and content of each chapter, with a full Test Bank. Thoroughly updated, the revised Third Edition addresses the latest trends in juvenile justice, supported by the most recent data sources available. The cutting-edge chapter on non-delinquent children in the juvenile justice system (dependent, neglected, and abused children) has been substantially updated. The delinquency prevention chapter has been updated to include a results-based review of programming that works, as well as an expanded treatment of the federal government's role in providing leadership in this critical part of juvenile justice. The notable chapter on gangs has been expanded to a broader discussion of juvenile violence across the board. Hallmark features of Juvenile Justice: Explores U.S. juvenile justice system in a logical, chronological format Provides the most recent and detailed information about the system Deals with all the major processing points, agencies, and issues Explains basic terms and concepts with valuable historical background Compelling vignette opens each chapter stimulates understanding reinforces basic concepts encourages class discussions Three themes engage students throughout: The role of theory to describe, understand, predict and control delinquency Historical background gives insights into future practices in juvenile justice International perspective for people interconnected by the Internet, social media

The unique design of this program provides participants with hands-on experience by presenting materials for two hypothetical legal matters: Dashwood, a civil case involving an elderly woman's independence; and Moore, a criminal case involving a young African-American woman accused of shoplifting. To create the interactive experience, participants receive one of two versions: Materials for A's or Materials for B's. Both versions include Part One: Interviewing Theory. Part Two of the A's version contains the attorney materials for Dashwood and the interviewee materials for Moore; the B's version contains the attorney materials for Moore and the interviewee materials for Dashwood. The participants experience hands-on learning as Group A interviews Group B, and Group B in turn interviews Group A. These interview exercises coordinate with the book chapters, guiding participants through each the stage of the interviewing process.

The world has changed in the last twenty years, and evidence has changed with it. Gone are the days when exhibits consisted of paper documents, photographs, and tangible items. Instead, we live in the era of instant messages, social site accounts that come and go, and online anonymity in need of piercing. Forgery, fraud, and falsehoods have always been with us, but the tools for committing these acts are now easily obtained and widely used.All this presents a host of new challenges to any attorney attempting to use or combat evidence from these sources. Our courts rely on evidence that is reliable and honest, and our job as lawyers is to find and confirm that reliable, honest evidence.Winning with Social Media is designed to help you do just that. It provides the tools you need to find and capture the online evidence that a party opponent may try to obscure, modify, or even erase from the Internet. With this guidebook at your side, you can do the research and evidence preservation necessary to make your case.New to the Second Edition: Updated with discussions of current tools such as Snapchat, TikTok, and moreUpdated authority dealing with social media evidenceExpanded discussion of Hearsay and social media evidenceChecklists for preparing witnesses for trialChecklists for assisting clients with discoveryChecklists for authenticating numerous sources of social media evidenceChecklist for an Authentication Hold letterAdditional checklist for sources of social media not included in the textProfessors and students will benefit from: Insightful and practical discussions of social media evidenceAids of mock trial and trial advocacy classes which may incorporate social media evidenceAn introduction of social media concepts for students and faculty who may not have an understanding of the evidentiary concepts associated with social media

Constitutional Law: Laying Down the Law is an accessible, hands-on workbook for courses on constitutional law, and it is an outstanding resource for students whether it is used in addition to a textbook or by itself.

Whether you are preparing for your first trial or your hundredth, Trial Advocacy Basics is the book for you. More than just a courtroom primer for novice and experienced trial attorneys, this completely revised edition focuses on what makes jurors tick, and how to effectively communicate the story of your case to both the jury and the judge. From case analysis and theory through cross-examination, impeachment, and closing arguments, Molly Townes O'Brien and Gary Gildin provide cutting-edge perspectives on how jurors think and how to optimize both the style and substance of your trial practice. O'Brien and Gildin relate practical advice on every stage of trial preparation and practice in a straightforward manner, using memorable examples and anecdotes, colorful quotes, and humor to highlight each lesson. New to the Third Edition: A chapter that introduces a new approach to aligning the substance of cases with contemporary findings from neuroscience and cognitive psychology of how the brain makes decisions. A more consistent emphasis across the chapters on the imperative of using the elements of story and stakes to calibrate the substance of a case to how the brain of the finder of fact--jury or judge--will reach a decision. Advice about adapting individual advocacy skills to the remote and hybrid proceedings that are likely to be a permanent fixture of courtroom proceedings post-pandemic. Professors and students will benefit from: A unified approach to crafting the substance of a case and correctly focusing advocacy efforts, founded in contemporary decision science that applies regardless of the facts of the individual case. A systematic approach to each individual advocacy skill, starting with identifying the substantive facts necessary to make a case, proceeding to how best to organizing the facts to maximize understanding and persuasiveness, and finally addressing tactics for delivering the information in court. Advice on adapting advocacy skills to remote proceedings.

In this adaptation of NITA's civil case file, Fordyce v. Harris and Felson, defendant Gerald Harris is charged with first degree assault with a deadly weapon. On the night of March 2, Henry Fordyce and his friend Eva Marie Long were having drinks at Gus's Bar & Grill in Nita City. Fordyce claims that Harris and his friend Eddie Felson were leering at and making insulting comments about Long, and when Fordyce confronted Harris and Felson, the three men got into a fight. After the police broke up the fight and all parties had left the bar, Fordyce claims that he was jumped in an alley and beaten by Harris and Felson. Felson agreed to testify against Harris as part of a plea agreement in a different case.Updated to reflect current monetary amounts, text messaging, and issues regarding evidence-gathering and chain of custody, this case file is designed to be used in a trial advocacy program as skill exercises or a final trial--or both. In addition, along with its companion file, Fordyce v. Harris and Felson, it can be effectively used to highlight the differences between civil and criminal advocacy techniques. Exhibits, diagrams, and police reports have been updated. Four new exhibits have been added, including photos of the weapon and a forensic evidence report.There are four witnesses for each side, no experts.

It's David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI's failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. One of NITA's most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. New to the Revised 11th Edition: Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion Professors and students will benefit from: A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits

Essentials of Victimology is an engaging new textbook for anyone seeking to gain a fundamental understanding of the field. Renowned author Jan Yager provides an awareness of the evolution of the discipline of victimology, as well as an understanding of the early and current theories, and a discussion of key concepts. The text includes practical, up-to-date chapters on victims and their interactions with the criminal justice system and on the medical and legal help available to victims. In addition, the major violent, property, and white-collar or economic crimes are explored in separate chapters.Throughout the book, the author utilizes examples and in-depth profiles to emphasize the real-life impact of crime on its victims. This well-structured text is designed with the student in mind, offering clear learning objectives, an overview of key terms and concepts, and effective end-of-chapter questions to reinforce the material.Based on the research, teaching, writing, and victim advocacy of accomplished author Jan Yager, Essentials of Victimology brings a modern and comprehensive perspective to this important field.Professors and student will benefit from: Multidisciplined approach that draws from not only sociology, criminology, and victimology but also anthropology, history, law, psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, and communication studies for insights and answers.Engaging presentation that brings the material to life.Numerous first-person interviews with crime victims or expertsClear explanations of the basic concepts accompanied by thoughtful discussions of cutting-edge issuesSeparate chapters on Child Victims and Teen victims, exploring topics not covered in other texts such as sibling sexual abuseUnique chapter on Victims of the Criminal Justice System (Chapter 14).

Taxation and Business Planning for Partnerships and LLCs, 2019-2020 Client File

NITA would like to acknowledge that this case file was produced through Emory's Center for Advocacy and Dispute Resolution, with a special thanks to Reuben Guttman and the firm of Grant & Eisenhofer for their help in authoring the materials. The four case files of United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et al. explore the suit brought by Juan Rodriguez, a prominent engineer, who acted as a whistleblower against his employer, Hughes Aircraft, for violations of the False Claims Act. Richard Hughes (CEO of Hughes Aircraft) learned that the United States Department of Defense (DOD) was looking for a new helicopter to provide to the Mexican government as part of the United States' Mérida Initiative, which provided Mexico resources to help it fight its war against the drug cartels. Hughes, on behalf of Hughes Aircraft, entered into a sole source contract with the DOD. Hughes was favorably positioned to do so as it was the sole manufacturer of the Screaming Eagle helicopter S-70, the model the DOD was seeking to purchase. Rodriguez's employment background put him in a position to ascertain whether his employer, Hughes Aircraft, was making false claims to the DOD. Initially, Rodriguez had been employed at Sikorsky Aircraft Inc., a predecessor of Hughes, working in the design and manufacture of the first Screaming Eagle helicopters. Later Sikorsky Aircraft was bought by Hughes Aircraft. During his tenure at Hughes, Rodriguez had designed and retrofitted early versions of the Screaming Eagle helicopter. When retrofitted with heavy missiles, one of the first versions, the UH-A, suffered cracks on landing. Accordingly, metals intended to help crash-proof the helicopter were added to the design. Hughes also started to employ Magnaflux testing to ensure that later versions of the Screaming Eagle did not have subsurface cracks. Rodriguez claims that he saw cracks in the cabin of one of the Screaming Eagles Mexico helicopters, and that he also saw workers welding over the cracks. Rodriguez claimed that he considered the welding over of cracks in the cabin of the Screaming Eagle a "cover up" of the failure to conduct testing and thus an act of fraud--passing on defective helicopters to the governments of the United States and Mexico.

It's David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI's failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. One of NITA's most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. New to the Revised 11th Edition: Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion Professors and students will benefit from: A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits

Buy a new version of this textbook and receive access to the Connected eBook on Casebook Connect, including lifetime access to the online ebook with highlight, annotation, and search capabilities. Access also includes an outline tool and other helpful resources. Connected eBooks provide what you need most to be successful in your law school classes. Fundamentals of U.S. Law by Fernholz and Collova introduces LLM students to the common law method of case analysis through concentrated study of topics in Tort and Constitutional Law. Fundamentals of U.S. Law teaches the "how" of legal practice in the United States. Students learn how to read cases, synthesize rules from reasoning, apply those rules to novel situations, and predict how the law may develop. The authors, two experienced lawyering skills instructors, use a half dozen fascinating and controversial topics to teach the signature skill of the common-law case method. Highlights of the First Edition: LLM students are bright, motivated, legally sophisticated, and ready to succeed. Fundamentals of U.S. Law plays to their strengths and mitigates their weaknesses. The textbook starts with a very short introduction to the legal system in the United States, followed by a discussion of one example of state common-law development. The rest of the textbook presents a set of interlinked topics of American constitutional law, all of which are likely to immediately engage student interest. No boring topics allowed. Students learn how courts use their decisions to create new law, the hallmark of common-law case development. Students also learn the fundamental skills of case analysis, including rule identification, rule synthesis, and application of the rule to novel facts. Students learn to apply these skills in American-style law school examinations. Professors and students will benefit from: Lightly-edited cases in topics most likely to interest lawyers educated outside of the United States Extensive introductions before each case, placing the case in historical and legal context and indicating those issues the student should consider while reading the case Extensive editorial notes in the initial cases to help students read cases more efficiently and effectively Notes that particularly focus on developing the skills of common-law case analysis Sample exam questions at or near the end of each chapter

Building contractor Taylor Addison suffered severe first- and second-degree burns when someone sideswiped her parked car. The impact spilled scalding coffee over her left hand, leaving her slightly scarred. In this hit-and-run, DUI case, Addison testifies that she saw a car identifiable as Jordan Peyton's driving away from the scene. Peyton has pled not guilty to all charges and claims that she did not collide with Addison's car. Is the damage on Peyton's car proof of a collision with Addison's, or merely coincidence? How do the field sobriety tests and BAC evidence influence the determination on whether Peyton hit Addison's car? Was Peyton's arrest and breathalyzer test mishandled? Advocates will enjoy working either side of this well-balanced case.New to the Third Edition: Body camera footage from Peyton's arrestStreamlined exhibits for ease of handlingImproved social media exhibitsMedical records of injuriesProfessors and students will benefit from: Flexibility; this case has expert testimony available for longer programs, but can be run without itRealistic exhibits, including recorded 9-1-1 call and body camera footageCompanion civil case available for a complete introduction to trial practice

Buy a new version of this textbook and receive access to the Connected eBook on Casebook Connect, including lifetime access to the online ebook with highlight, annotation, and search capabilities. Access also includes an outline tool and other helpful resources. Connected eBooks provide what you need most to be successful in your law school classes. Resolving Disputes: Theory, Practice, and Law, Fourth Edition, covers negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and hybrid approaches, preparing law students to represent clients in all types of alternative dispute resolution. The text is practical, while grounded in theory. Drawing on the authors' decades of experience as teachers, practicing neutrals, and ADR trainers, this casebook provides vivid examples from actual cases, literature, and current media. It also offers diverse readings by leading authors, along with comprehensive video-based resources and attention to prominent developments in the field. The text integrates coverage of law, ethics, and practice, as well as interesting notes, thoughtful problems, and provocative questions. New to the Fourth Edition: Fresh new material and perspectives benefiting from two new coauthors More problems, techniques, resources, and video-based examples of effective representation in mediation Integrated access to videos, allowing students to view professionals applying techniques discussed in the book as they read Streamlined presentation--concise excerpts and summaries that allow shorter reading assignments Greater coverage of online dispute resolution (ODR) and dispute systems design (DSD)--two of the most important new directions in the field Increased focus on gender, #MeToo, culture, social activism, historical inequities, anti-racism, and other crucial issues affecting dispute resolution today Discussion of how dispute resolution is changing with new technological advances, social trends and hybrid processes Expanded arbitration section, with attention to adhesion contracts, recent cases and legislation Access to arbitration games, exercises and streaming interviews with top arbitration experts An in-depth chapter on mixing ADR modes and hybrid processes Professors and student will benefit from: Organization and readings designed to be used as part of an active experiential class without sacrificing the deep knowledge expected in a law school course Informal writing style, interesting examples, practical advice, and thought-provoking questions, all written specifically for law students who will soon represent clients in resolving disputes Practice-based approach that helps students apply the concepts and better identify the value in the content Exercises and problems that facilitate classroom discussion