Is The Higher Criticism Scholarly? Clearly Attested Facts Showing That The Destructive Assured Results Of Modern Scholarship Are Indefensible (1922)

The book titled ""Is The Higher Criticism Scholarly? Clearly Attested Facts Showing That The Destructive Assured Results Of Modern Scholarship Are Indefensible"" was written by Robert Dick Wilson and was published in 1922. The book is a critical analysis of the field of higher criticism, which is a method of biblical interpretation that seeks to understand the historical and cultural context of the Bible. Wilson argues that modern scholarship's approach to higher criticism is flawed and that its conclusions are indefensible. He presents a series of clearly attested facts that he believes show the destructive results of this approach. Wilson also challenges the idea that higher criticism is a scholarly pursuit, suggesting instead that it is a biased and subjective interpretation of the Bible. Throughout the book, Wilson provides detailed examples and arguments to support his position, drawing on his extensive knowledge of biblical languages and history. He also critiques the work of several prominent scholars in the field of higher criticism, including Julius Wellhausen and Hermann Gunkel. Overall, ""Is The Higher Criticism Scholarly?"" is a thought-provoking and controversial work that challenges the prevailing view of higher criticism as a legitimate scholarly pursuit. It is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of biblical interpretation and the ongoing debates surrounding the interpretation of the Bible.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.